MWA - Municipal Waste Association | Dedicated to Waste Minimization and Diversion

Sharing 3Rs Experience & Expertise Since 1987

Member's Portal


Given the recent developments around Ontario’s transition to full producer responsibility, one of our members Neil Menezes, President EcoCompass Inc. provided his take here :

The Municipal Waste Association is pleased to put out the latest edition of For R Information, our membership newsletter! This edition is a special one – packed with articles and resources relevant for the current challenges and solutions in our industry.

  • Updates about MWA
  • Guest articles on new recycling technology and infrastructure
  • Announcing the winners of the 2020 P&E Awards
  • A dose of inspiration for us all in these difficult times

Download a copy of the Summer 2020 Newsletter here!

On behalf of the Board and the P&E Awards Judging Panel, the MWA would like to congratulate the winners of the 2020 P&E Awards, and to all municipalities that submitted this year.

These awards celebrate the creativity and innovation that go into advancing public engagement in waste diversion. They’re an opportunity to recognize the success of our colleagues in the municipal waste sector. 

As John Watson, judge and host of the P&E Awards, remarked, “our industry learns from the success that everyone shares with each other…it’s vital that we can learn from best practices, so we can use our [resources] in a targeted way to increase waste diversion in our respective municipalities.”

Congratulations to the winners

Samples of the P&E campaigns and tools submitted for the awards are available to members on the MWA members portal!

Thanks to our P&E Awards Sponsor

The Compost Council of Canada has published the data from its 2020 national survey on compost and anaerobic digestion facilities in Canada. The interactive map posted on allows you to explore provincial and territorial-specific composting infrastructure, regulations, guidelines, and other industry information.

“Summary results of the recent national survey of organics recycling survey conducted by The Compost Council of Canada are now being shared on Summary information about many of the centralized composting and anaerobic digestion facilities in Canada along with information concerning regulations, guidelines and other information documents that impact the current and future development of the Canadian organics recycling industry are also being identified through an interactive map according to province and the territories.”

Compost Council of Canada, 2020.

As we continue to monitor the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada and the growing response from all levels of governments, the MWA has started compiling a list of resources to help municipalities navigate the impacts of COVID-19 on waste and recycling programs, and how they can ensure continuity of service and safety for staff and residents.

Impacts of COVID-19 on the solid waste and recycling sector:

Response from the Government of Ontario:

On March 23, 2020 the Ontario government ordered the closure of all non-essential services to help fight the spread of Covid-19. A list of essential services was created. Some of the services deemed essential and may continue operating apply directly to our members. These include services that help to ensure safe and effective waste management, that support environmental management/monitoring and spill clean-up and response, waste collection, waste/sewage treatment and disposal, operation of landfills, and hazardous waste disposal.

How municipalities are responding:

Based on surveys and online research conducted by the MWA and the Regional Public Works Commissioners of Ontario (RPWCO), we have assembled a spreadsheet that provides status updates of several municipal waste management programs. This spreadsheet identifies canceled or modified waste collection programs with further details and links. If your municipal program is not listed or needs to be updated, please contact

Important resources for COVID-19 contingency planning:

COVID-19: cleaning in non-healthcare settings Special guidelines for cleaning and safe waste management for residents and municipalities. Public Health England
Emergency Waste Contingency Plan for Border Disruption due to COVID-19 Letter to MOECP on impacts of US border disruptions on the export of solid waste for disposal in US landfill sites, and recommended policy actions. Ontario Waste Management Association (OWMA)
COVID-19 ResourcesMunicipal aspects of the COVID-19 PandemicAssociation of Ontario Municipalities (AMO)
COVID-19 General Safety Checklist for Recycling Operations A checklist that provides an assortment of modified procedures and ways of doing business to keep employees, customers, and visitors safe.The Canadian Association of Recycling Industries (CARI)
COVID-19 and zero wasteThis webinar will bring together waste and health experts to assess the impacts that the COVID-19 virus is having on zero waste policies and strategies in Europe. It will examine whether governments can simultaneously prioritise the health and protection of their citizens, whilst also progressing towards their local zero waste agenda.Zero Waste Europe
Waste collection worker health and safety during COVID-19This document outlines best practices, tips and additional resources for employers to ensure they are taking all reasonable precautions to protect waste collection worker health and safety during COVID-19Infrastructure Health & Safety Association (IHSA)

As new developments emerge in Ontario’s response to COVID-19, we expect to see a growing list of municipal contingency plans for waste and recycling collection and/or processing services. As these plans become publicly available, we will post them here to share so that our members can stay informed and prepared, together.

Take care. Stay safe. Keep calm and carry on.

Trevor and Mike, from the MWA.

Jeff Yurek, Minister of the Environment, Conservation, and Parks and the Steve Clark, Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing made a joint announcement outlining the process to transition the costs of the Blue Box Program away from municipal taxpayers to the producers that bring products and packaging to market.

The first measure issues direction to Stewardship Ontario to describe a mechanism for determining steward fees necessary to provide for payments to municipalities and First Nations until the time they transfer responsibility for providing Blue Box services to producers.

In addition, the plan will establish criteria for a three-year period in which communities will no longer be eligible to receive funding through Stewardship Ontario starting Jan. 1, 2023 and ending Dec. 31, 2025, when Stewardship Ontario will cease operations.

The minister also issued direction to the Resource Productivity and Recovery Authority, as part of its duties to oversee Stewardship Ontario and the Blue Box Program, to determine the amount of money required by Stewardship Ontario to carry out its responsibilities and monitor the effectiveness while plans and transition are carried out.

It is anticipated that over 2020, Ontario will develop and consult on regulations to support a full producer responsibility framework for the Blue Box Program with an intention for more consistency and a standardized list of materials for recycling in the Blue Box.

The report’s recommendations inform the MECP of the next steps for improving the Blue Box Program to reduce costs, increase diversion rates and reduce plastic waste and litter. Going forward, we have been informed that municipal stakeholders will have ample opportunities for input into transitioning the Blue Box Program to producer responsibility. 

Below is a list of the recommendations from the report, by topic:
Report Recommendations:
1) A measured timeframe for transition
• Transition should occur over a six-year period according to the following approximate timelines (i.e., from 2019 through 2025):
o Before the end of 2019: Minister issues transition direction to Stewardship Ontario outlining the timeline for transition.
o Over a one to one-and-a-half-year period (e.g., 2019-2020): Government consults on, and finalizes, regulations that specify how the blue box will move to producer responsibility.
o Over a two-year period (e.g., 2021-2022): Producers prepare to assume responsibility for the blue box and engage all parties, including municipalities and service providers.
o Over a three-year period (e.g., 2023-2025): Phased transfer of responsibility from municipalities to producers that transitions a similar amount of waste over each year.
• The province should provide transition direction and begin gathering the necessary information as early as possible to help all parties plan for the new producer responsibility framework.
• The province should issue a consultation document to provide additional information and clarification when consulting on the draft regulations.
• To provide the certainty needed to kick-start planning for transition, the timeline should provide early notification of the government’s plan for producer responsibility, expedited development of producer responsibility regulations, and sufficient time for municipalities and producers to prepare.

2) Ensuring a common collection system
• Regulations should maintain blue box collection as an essential part of any collection system, but also allow producers the flexibility to collect some packaging through other methods.
• Taken together, the blue box and other methods will create a common collection system that will give producers access to the materials they need to recycle and will ensure that the people of Ontario have uninterrupted service across the province during the transition period.
• The regulation-making process will determine how this collection system is to be established. The complexity of doing so should not be underestimated, which is why I recommend that the first step must be to collect and analyze the information on the existing blue box and recycling system in Ontario. This information could include:
o Programs and collection methods operated by municipalities.
o Populations serviced by blue box programs.
o Expiry of municipal collection contracts and lifespan of waste facilities.
o Municipal readiness to transition.
o Location of waste transfer, sorting and processing facilities.
o The volumes and flows of collected printed paper and packaging.
• The province should consider retaining expert advice to analyze the collected information and provide a recommendation on how best to proceed with transitioning services. This information will inform the regulation development and facilitate producer preparation.

3) Transitioning municipal assets
• Parties agreed that if producers are given full responsibility and accountability, they must have control to decide which assets will be used in a future collection and management system. Producers should not be forced to use, or pay for, municipal assets they do not need.
• Parties agreed that municipalities must be able to bid fairly on future services for producers, and municipalities may decide whether, and how, their existing assets may be part of their bids.

4) Standardizing what’s in the blue box
• Regulations should make producers responsible for all printed paper and packaging they put into the market by setting clear goals for diversion from landfill, but they should provide flexibility for producers to identify the best way to achieve these goals.
• Regulations should establish a standard list of blue box materials that must be collected through blue boxes across Ontario, and also allow producers to use other methods to meet or supplement diversion requirements.
• Regulations should establish a transparent process that will allow producers to change which materials are collected in the blue box versus other methods.
• Producers should be encouraged to use other methods to divert materials that cannot be recycled by the blue box or that might contaminate collected materials.

5) Determining eligible sources for blue box materials
• Producers should provide blue box collection wherever it was provided by municipalities or Indigenous communities as of a specified date, and going forward they will provide blue box service for new residential developments.
• After completing transition, producers should gradually expand collection in multi-residential buildings, as well as parks and public spaces where municipalities provide waste collection.
• Blue box services should not be expanded to industrial, commercial and institutional establishments as these facilities already have their own waste servicing arrangements and existing contracts for diversion. In addition, recycling in these facilities is covered by a different regulatory framework at this time.
• It is important that Ontarians have similar opportunities to recycle whether they are at home, work or out in public. The province should review and modernize the regulatory framework for industrial, commercial and institutional facilities to improve overall diversion rates in Ontario and to better align the kinds of materials recycled in this sector with the materials that are recycled through the blue box.

6) Setting effective diversion targets
• A single, overall blue box target is neither workable nor effective. The province should consult to identify specific targets for different types of printed paper and packaging material.
• The categories should be specific enough that they can be used to identify materials that have low diversion rates, so that action can be taken to improve diversion.
• The province should set targets that will drive diversion and challenge the ingenuity of Ontario’s industry to innovate and find new efficiencies and cost-savings.
• Targets should progressively increase over time to ensure that Ontario’s recycling services continue to innovate and evolve.

7) Promoting increased diversion from landfill
• Reduce, reuse, recycle should count as diversion. That is, processes that continue to make materials available as a resource for new products or packaging should be considered diversion.
• Incineration and energy-from-waste should not count as diversion.
• Don’t lose sight of the first R – reduction. Where feasible, producer responsibility regulations should recognize and reward producers for reducing waste and improving their environmental performance.

8) Thinking bigger than the blue box
• Co-ordinated, province-wide promotion and education is critical to build upon our blue box culture, reduce litter, and make waste reduction a part of everyday life.
• Ontario should take strong action to reduce plastic pollution and be a voice for decisive, focused, and coordinated action at both the national and international level. All parties must not lose sight of the fact that packaging is only one part of our plastics problem.
• The province should ensure that all ministries work together to develop a collaborative plan for Ontario to become a leading jurisdiction for innovation and economic growth in the recycling industry.

Please see the link below for the full report: